Polarity of comments and internal consistency in peer review reports on scientific research articles

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAstudillo, Cesar
dc.contributor.authorSquadrito, Karem
dc.contributor.authorVaras, German
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorSabaj, Omar
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T12:41:34Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T12:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPeer review reports on scientific articles means a key genre to explain how scientific knowledge is collectively constructed. In these reports, reviewers write a recommendation for publication along with a series of comments. The quality analysis of the peer review process has been commonly conducted based on indicators, such as rejection rates and the agreement level among evaluators. However, a more qualitative investigation on the process still remains outstanding. This work aims at describing the polarity ( positive, negative and neutral) of comments corresponding to 56 peer review reports belonging to the journal Onomazein and determining whether this proportion is consistent with the reviewers recommendation, i.e. Accepted, Accepted with major revisions, Accepted with minor revisions and Rejected). After the analysis of 1.472 comments, it was possible to determine that the highest proportion of comments is negative, independent of the decision. The analyzed processes also showed a high level of consistency. The more favorable the recommendation, the higher the proportion of positive comments, and, consequently, the less the proportion of negative comments.
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2024-06-14
dc.format.extent10 páginas
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.issn1726-569X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/77429
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000388360800013
dc.information.autorucLetras;Gonzalez C;S/I;95243
dc.information.autorucLetras;Squadrito K;S/I;220500
dc.issue.numero1
dc.language.isoes
dc.nota.accesocontenido parcial
dc.pagina.final128
dc.pagina.inicio119
dc.publisherUNIV CHILE, CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO ESTUDIOS BIOETICA
dc.revistaACTA BIOETHICA
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectpeer review process
dc.subjectconsistency
dc.subjectpeer review report
dc.subjectevaluative polarity
dc.subjectMANUSCRIPTS
dc.subjectREFEREES
dc.titlePolarity of comments and internal consistency in peer review reports on scientific research articles
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen22
sipa.codpersvinculados95243
sipa.codpersvinculados220500
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.indexScielo
sipa.indexScopus
sipa.trazabilidadCarga SIPA;09-01-2024
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Polarity of comments and internal consistency in peer review reports on scientific research articles.pdf
Size:
2.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas