Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMeneses-Echavez, José Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorRada G., Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorFlottorp, Signe
dc.contributor.authorMoberg, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T14:35:10Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T14:35:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-05-30T00:02:17Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Background: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks bring clarity, structure and transparency to health care decision making. The interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) tool, developed in the context of the DECIDE project and published by Epistemonikos, is a stand-alone online solution for producing and using EtD frameworks. Since its development, little is known about how organizations have been using the iEtD tool and what characterizes users’ experiences with it. This missing information is necessary for any teams planning future developments of the iEtD tool. Methods: This study aimed to describe users’ experiences with the iEtD and identify main barriers and facilitators related to use. We contacted all users registered in the iEtD via email and invited people who identified themselves as having used the solution to a semi-structured interview. Audio recordings were transcribed, and one researcher conducted a directed content analysis of the interviews guided by a user experience framework. Two researchers checked the content independently for accuracy. Results: Out of 860 people contacted, 81 people replied to our introductory email (response rate 9.4%). Twenty of these had used the tool in a real scenario and were invited to an interview. We interviewed all eight users that accepted this invitation (from six countries, four continents). ‘Guideline development’ was the iEtD use scenario they most commonly identified. Most participants reported an overall positive experience, without major difficulties navigating or using the different sections. They reported having used most of the EtD framework criteria. Participants reported tailoring their frameworks, for instance by adding or deleting criteria, translating to another language, or rewording headings. Several people preferred to produce a Word version rather than working online, due to the burden of completing the framework, or lack of experience with the tool. Some reported difficulties working with the exportable formats, as they needed considerable editing. Conclusion: A very limited number of guideline developers have used the iEtD tool published by Epistemonikos since its development. Although users’ general experiences are positive, our work has identified some aspects of the tool that need improvement. Our findings could be also applied to development or improvement of other solutions for producing or using EtD frameworks.
dc.format.extent11 páginas
dc.fuente.origenAutoarchivo
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021 May 25;21(1):169
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12911-021-01532-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01532-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/60460
dc.issue.numero169
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido completo
dc.pagina.final11
dc.pagina.inicio1
dc.relationCorrection to: Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis
dc.relation.0Correction to: Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis
dc.relation.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/60984
dc.revistaBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Makinges_ES
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.subjectDecision-makinges_ES
dc.subjectClinical decision supportes_ES
dc.subjectEvidence-based health carees_ES
dc.subjectGRADE approaches_ES
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.subject.deweyMedicina y saludes_ES
dc.titleUsers’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysises_ES
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen21
sipa.codpersvinculados11470
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12911_2021_Article_1532.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas