Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDurante, Federica
dc.contributor.authorFiske, Susan T.
dc.contributor.authorKervyn, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorCuddy, Amy J. C.
dc.contributor.authorAkande, Adebowale (Debo)
dc.contributor.authorAdetoun, Bolanle E.
dc.contributor.authorAdewuyi, Modupe F.
dc.contributor.authorTserere, Magdeline M.
dc.contributor.authorAl Ramiah, Ananthi
dc.contributor.authorMastor, Khairul Anwar
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Fiona Kate
dc.contributor.authorBonn, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorTafarodi, Romin W.
dc.contributor.authorBosak, Janine
dc.contributor.authorCairns, Ed
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Claire
dc.contributor.authorCapozza, Dora
dc.contributor.authorChandran, Anjana
dc.contributor.authorChryssochoou, Xenia
dc.contributor.authorIatridis, Tilemachos
dc.contributor.authorContreras, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCosta-Lopes, Rui
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Janet I.
dc.contributor.authorTushabe, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorLeyens, Jacques-Philippe
dc.contributor.authorMayorga, Renee
dc.contributor.authorRouhana, Nadim N.
dc.contributor.authorSmith Castro, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Rolando
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Bailon, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorMoya, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorMorales Marente, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPalacios Galvez, Marisol
dc.contributor.authorSibley, Chris G.
dc.contributor.authorAsbrock, Frank
dc.contributor.authorStorari, Chiara C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T00:07:49Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T00:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractIncome inequality undermines societies: The more inequality, the more health problems, social tensions, and the lower social mobility, trust, life expectancy. Given people's tendency to legitimate existing social arrangements, the stereotype content model (SCM) argues that ambivalence?perceiving many groups as either warm or competent, but not both?may help maintain socio-economic disparities. The association between stereotype ambivalence and income inequality in 37 cross-national samples from Europe, the Americas, Oceania, Asia, and Africa investigates how groups' overall warmth-competence, status-competence, and competition-warmth correlations vary across societies, and whether these variations associate with income inequality (Gini index). More unequal societies report more ambivalent stereotypes, whereas more equal ones dislike competitive groups and do not necessarily respect them as competent. Unequal societies may need ambivalence for system stability: Income inequality compensates groups with partially positive social images.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjso.12005
dc.identifier.eissn2044-8309
dc.identifier.issn0144-6665
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12005
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/101933
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000327778400008
dc.issue.numero4
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final746
dc.pagina.inicio726
dc.revistaBritish journal of social psychology
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subject.ods10 Reduced Inequality
dc.subject.odspa10 Reducción de las desigualdades
dc.titleNations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen52
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas