Percent body fat, skinfold thickness or body mass index for defining obesity or overweight, as a risk factor for asthma in schoolchildren: Which one to use in epidemiological studies?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Marcos, Luis
dc.contributor.authorValverde-Molina, José
dc.contributor.authorCastaños Ortega, Maria L.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Solís de Querol, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Torres, Antonela Elena
dc.contributor.authorCastro Rodríguez, José Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T15:54:15Z
dc.date.available2022-01-11T15:54:15Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractNone of the epidemiological studies indicating that obesity is a risk factor for asthma in schoolchildren have used the percent body fat (PBF) to define obesity. The present study compares the definition of obesity using body mass index (BMI), PBF and the raw sum of the thickness of four skinfolds (SFT) to evaluate this condition as a risk factor for asthma. All classes of children of the target ages of 6-8 years of all schools in four municipalities of Murcia (Spain) were surveyed. Participation rate was 70.2% and the number of children included in the study was 931. Height, weight and SFT (biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac) were measured according to standard procedures. Current active asthma was defined from several questions of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire. Obesity was defined using two standard cut-off points for BMI and PBF, and the 85th percentile for BMI, PBF and SFT. The highest quartile of each type of measurement was also compared with the lowest. A multiple logistic regression analysis was made for the various obesity definitions, adjusting for age, asthma in the mother and father and gender. The adjusted odds ratios of having asthma among obese children were different for boys and girls and varied across the different obesity definitions. For the standard cut-off points of BMI they were 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-3.43]for girls and 2.00 (95% CI 0.97-4.10) for boys; however, for PBF (boys 25%, girls 30%) the corresponding figures were 1.54 (95% CI 0.63-3.73) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.66-2.21). BMI, PBF and SFT showed more consistency between each other when using the other cut-off points. BMI, PBF (except standard cut-off points) and SFT produce relatively comparable results when analysing the interaction between obesity and asthma.
dc.fuente.origenORCID
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00144.x
dc.identifier.issn1740-8709
dc.identifier.pubmedid18811794
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00144.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-52649091756&partnerID=MN8TOARS
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/63173
dc.information.autorucEscuela de medicina ; Castro Rodríguez, José Antonio ; 0000-0002-0708-4281 ; 113247
dc.issue.numeroNo. 4
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesoContenido completo
dc.pagina.final310
dc.pagina.inicio304
dc.provenancengjara 2022-01-11 12:54:15
dc.relation.isformatofMaternal and Child Nutrition, vol. 4, no. 4 (2008), pp. 304-310.
dc.revistaMaternal and Child Nutrition
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectAsthma
dc.subjectBody fat
dc.subjectBody mass index
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectObesity
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.subject.deweyMedicina y saludes_ES
dc.subject.otherMedicina y salud
dc.titlePercent body fat, skinfold thickness or body mass index for defining obesity or overweight, as a risk factor for asthma in schoolchildren: Which one to use in epidemiological studies?
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumenVol. 4
sipa.codpersvinculados113247
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Maternal Child Nutrition - 2008 - Garcia‐Marcos - Percent body fat skinfold thickness or body mass index for defining.pdf
Size:
78.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas