Chile’s failed constitutional intent: Polarization, fragmentation, haste and delegitimization
dc.catalogador | jca | |
dc.contributor.author | Palanza, María Valeria | |
dc.contributor.author | Sotomayor Valarezo, Patricia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-02T19:04:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-02T19:04:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article suggests that the conditions under which the Chilean constitutional process of 2021–22 undertook its task held the seeds of its doom. Constitutional conventions are always tasked with reaching agreements on the controversial allocation of decision rights, and doing so is no simple feat. The Chilean process combined (1) very dispersed preferences regarding the problems the new constitution should solve and the institutions to best enable solutions, with (2) a brief timeframe to allow for agreements to emerge, aggravated by (3) a composition of the Convention that was dominated by independents lacking experience in legislative bargaining, and (4) a severe disenchantment of the population with parties and politics as the backdrop. Together, these hurdles proved impossible to overcome. Despite the notorious political achievements of the Committee we study here, the proposal that came out of Chile’s Constitutional Convention in 2021 was plagued by controversy and a negative perception of the Convention’s work, and was ultimately rejected by the people. | |
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital | 2023-11-02 | |
dc.fuente.origen | Cambridge University Press | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S204538172300028X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2045-3825 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538172300028X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/75216 | |
dc.information.autoruc | Instituto de Ciencia Política;Palanza, Maria Valeria; 0000-0002-1383-4675; 1008441 | |
dc.information.autoruc | Instituto de Ciencia Política;Sotomayor Valarezo, Patricia;0000-0002-6218-471X;1139376 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.nota.acceso | Contenido completo | |
dc.pagina.final | 10 | |
dc.pagina.inicio | 1 | |
dc.revista | Global Constitutionalism | |
dc.rights | acceso abierto | |
dc.subject | Chile | |
dc.subject | Constitutional process | |
dc.subject | Constitutional Convention | |
dc.subject | Polarization | |
dc.subject | Political disenchantment | |
dc.subject | Delegitimization | |
dc.subject.ddc | 320 | |
dc.subject.dewey | Ciencias políticas | es_ES |
dc.subject.ods | 16 Peace and Justice Strong Institutions | |
dc.subject.odspa | 16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas | |
dc.title | Chile’s failed constitutional intent: Polarization, fragmentation, haste and delegitimization | |
dc.type | artículo | |
sipa.codpersvinculados | 1008441 | |
sipa.codpersvinculados | 1139376 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- chiles-failed-constitutional-intent-polarization-fragmentation-haste-and-delegitimization.pdf
- Size:
- 256.14 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: