Wherefore art thou competitors? How situational affordances help differentiate among prosociality, individualism, and competition

Simple item page
dc.catalogadorjca
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yi
dc.contributor.authorStivers, Adam W.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Ryan O.
dc.contributor.authorVan Doesum, Niels J.
dc.contributor.authorJoireman, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorGallucci, Marcello
dc.contributor.authorAharonov-Majar, Efrat
dc.contributor.authorAthenstaedt, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorBai, Liying
dc.contributor.authorBohm, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBuchan, Nancy R.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiao-Ping
dc.contributor.authorDumont, Kitty B.
dc.contributor.authorEngelmann, Jan B.
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Kimmo
dc.contributor.authorEuh, Hyun
dc.contributor.authorFiedler, Susann
dc.contributor.authorFriesen, Justin
dc.contributor.authorGachter, Simon
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Sylvie
dc.contributor.authorGrowiec, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorHrebickova, Martina
dc.contributor.authorKaragonlar, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorKiyonari, Toko
dc.contributor.authorKou, Yu
dc.contributor.authorKuhlman, D. Michael
dc.contributor.authorLay Martínez, Siugmin Paz
dc.contributor.authorLeonardelli, Geoffrey J.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Norman P.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yang
dc.contributor.authorMaciejovsky, Boris
dc.contributor.authorManesi, Zoi
dc.contributor.authorMashuri, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMok, Aurelia
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Karin S.
dc.contributor.authorNetedu, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorPammi, Chandrasekhar
dc.contributor.authorPlatow, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorReinders Folmer, Christopher P.
dc.contributor.authorReyna, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorSimao, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorUtz, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meij, Leander
dc.contributor.authorWaldzus, Sven
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yiwen
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorWeisel, Ori
dc.contributor.authorWildschut, Tim
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorWu, Junhui
dc.contributor.authorYong, Jose C.
dc.contributor.authorVan Lange, Paul A. M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-25T16:17:22Z
dc.date.available2025-03-25T16:17:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe Triple Dominance Measure (choosing between prosocial, individualistic, and competitive options) and the Slider Measure ("sliding" between various orientations, for example, from individualistic to prosocial) are two widely used techniques to measure social value orientation, that is, the weight individuals assign to own and others' outcomes in interdependent situations. Surprisingly, there is only moderate correspondence between these measures, but it is unclear why and what the implications are for identifying individual differences in social value orientation. Using a dataset of 8021 participants from 31 countries and regions, this study revealed that the Slider Measure identified fewer competitors than the Triple Dominance Measure, accounting for approximately one-third of the non-correspondence between the two measures. This is (partially) because many of the Slider items do not afford a competitive option. In items where competition is combined with individualism, competitors tended to make the same choices as individualists. Futhermore, we demonstrated the uniqueness of competitors. Compared to prosocials and individualists, competitors exhibited lower levels of both social mindfulness and trust. Overall, the present work highlights the importance of situational affordances in measuring personality, the benefits of distinguishing between individualists and competitors, and the importance of utilizing a measure that distinguishes between these two proself orientations.
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2025-03-12
dc.format.extent22 páginas
dc.fuente.origenORCID
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/08902070241298850
dc.identifier.eissn1099-0984
dc.identifier.issn0890-2070
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241298850
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/102984
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001368446700001
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Psicología; Lay Martínez, Siugmin Paz; 0000-0001-7800-1554; 150515
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido completo
dc.revistaEuropean Journal of Personality
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectSocial value orientation
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.subjectSituational affordances
dc.subjectCompetitors
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.deweyCiencias socialeses_ES
dc.subject.ods01 Fin de la pobreza
dc.subject.ods16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
dc.subject.ods01 No poverty
dc.subject.odspa16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
dc.titleWherefore art thou competitors? How situational affordances help differentiate among prosociality, individualism, and competition
dc.typeartículo
sipa.codpersvinculados150515
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2024-12-14
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
liu-et-al-2024-wherefore-art-thou-competitors-how-situational-affordances-help-differentiate-among-prosociality.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas