Assessment of Patients Receiving Short-Interval Botulinum Toxin Chemodenervation Treatment for Laryngeal Dystonia and Essential Tremor of the Vocal Tract
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
ImportanceThe gold-standard treatment for laryngeal dystonia (LD) and essential tremor of the vocal tract (ETVT) is botulinum toxin (BoNT) chemodenervation. Although safe and effective, it is not curative, and periodic injections are required. Some medical insurance companies only cover injections at a 3-month interval, though some patients benefit from injections more frequently.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion and characteristics of patients who receive BoNT chemodenervation treatment in intervals shorter than 90 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study across 3 quaternary care neurolaryngology specialty practices in Washington and California recruited patients who underwent at least 4 consecutive laryngeal BoNT injections for LD and/or ETVT in the past 5 years. Data were collected from March through June 2022 and analyzed from June through December 2022.ExposureLaryngeal BoNT treatment.Main Outcomes and MeasuresBiodemographic and clinical variables, injection characteristics, evolution during the 3 interinjection intervals, and lifetime laryngeal BoNT treatment data were collected from patient medical records. Logistic regression was used to assess association to the short-interval outcome, defined as an average injection interval shorter than 90 days.ResultsOf 255 patients included from the 3 institutions, 189 (74.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 62.7 (14.3) years. The predominant diagnosis was adductor LD (n = 199 [78.0%]), followed by adductor dystonic voice tremor (n = 26 [10.2%]) and ETVT (n = 13 [5.1%]). Seventy patients (27.5%) received short-interval injections (<90 days). The short-interval group was younger than the long-interval group (≥90 days), with a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (15.5) years and 64.2 (13.5) years, respectively, and a mean difference of −5.7 years (95% CI, −9.6 to −1.8 years). There were no patient-related differences between the short- and long-interval groups in terms of sex, employment status, or diagnosis.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study demonstrated that while insurance companies often mandate a 3-month or greater interval for BoNT chemodenervation financial coverage, there is a considerable subset of patients with LD and ETVT who receive short-interval treatment to optimize their vocal function. Short-interval chemodenervation injections demonstrate a similar adverse effect profile and do not appear to predispose to resistance through antibody formation.