Confrontation as a driver of moral and social change in gendered relations : when can morality change?
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The goal of this thesis was to identify if and how can morality change after
confrontation within gendered dynamics. In order to know if morality can change after
confrontation, two studies were designed, each assessing a different aspect of morality,
its processing (automatic and reflexive modes of moral cognitive process) and its
content (moral values). In both studies, females were the confronters (as a programmed
response and as a memory of a past confrontation). The first two articles report on two
empirical studies, and the third article is a theoretical perspective. Finally, an additional
fourth article (Appendix B), follows up on the theoretical discussion of the third article.
In the first article, the cognitive moral processing of moral dilemmas (expressed
in reaction time and perception of the dilemma´s difficulty) was investigated after male
participants were confronted or not (experimental condition) by a bot passing as a
female participant for sending sexist jokes. One week prior to the experiment,
participants answered to several individual differences for a moderation hypothesis. An
interaction was found in the opposite hypothesized direction, as participants with higher
support for male norms against femininity are slower in answering moral dilemmas after
being confronted. Further, qualitative analysis showed that confrontation increases
defensive mechanisms and evaluative concerns, whereas not confronting leads to a lack
of guilt.
The second article focused on another dimension of morality, investigating
participant´s support for egalitarian moral values after a past event were they were
confronted by (or had a good experience with) a woman. Results show that, overall,
participants with low levels of male norms regarding status and social dominance
orientation had a greater support for diversity after remembering a confrontation while
participants with higher levels of such individual differences value diversity more after
remembering harmony.
The third article works on a theoretical elaboration of conflict and
confrontation´s role in promoting processes related to moral change, being it social or
individual, as a result of the process of reflection that was done during this thesis. To
argue that, conflict and confrontation are differentiated, predictors of conflict are
explored in its objective and subjective components, the logic of conflict in its main
weighting of pros and cons are explained, main reasons related to the resistance to
confrontation are proposed, and the main reported outcomes are discussed.
Finally, an additional paper was written to further explore the problem proposed
in article three regarding the resistance to confrontation within the hegemonic forms of
existence (Appendix B). It discusses how the social mobilization from the subordinate
groups, and its production of decolonized knowledge, affects the appearance of harmony
by disrupting shared knowledge and questioning legitimizing myths. Thus, intergroup
conflict can also be understood as a symptom of rigidity to change when facing
alternative subjective productions which questions the hegemonic social structure
inherited – and still reproducing – from colonization.
Taken together, these findings question notions of harmony in intergroup
relations, by highlighting the experiences of agency of the subordinate groups, with a
special emphasis on women. By showing that subordinate groups are fighting for the
improvement of their social conditions, it questions if confrontation is not a reaction to
violence instead of the initiation of it. Further, it researches what are the consequences
of confrontation on morality, which also might affect mobilization for social change
later on. We hope that this thesis can deepen conversations regarding the tension
between diversity and equality and can shed light on processes of change, which are
inevitable, for better or for worst.
Description
Tesis (Doctor in Psychology)--Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2021