Comparing green spaces provision and accessibility indicators over a latitudinal gradient and multiple climate zones

Simple item page
dc.catalogadorpau
dc.contributor.authorDe la Barrera, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorReyes Paecke, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorTruffello, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorDe la Fuente, Helen E.
dc.contributor.authorSalinas, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorVillegas, Rodrigo A.
dc.contributor.authorSteiniger, Stefan
dc.contributor.otherCEDEUS (Chile)
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-27T15:16:02Z
dc.date.available2023-11-27T15:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractMonitoring urban green space (UGS) indicators is key to assessing progress against the UNs sustainable devel-opment goals (SDGs). Within these indicators, measuring the provision of UGS as well as its accessibility is considered a major objective. However, neither the relationship between the two indicators, nor differences related to different types of UGS have been adequately evaluated. In this paper, these two indicators are calculated and analyzed for four size-based types of UGS and for 69 municipalities, which are part of the 16 regional capital cities of Chile. For the provision indicator, the average calculated over all municipalities does not reach the often proposed standard of 11 sq.m/inhab., but only 5.29 sq.m/inhab. Regarding the accessibility indicator, when a walking speed of 4 km/h is considered, the smaller residential green spaces have the highest accessibility (65 % of the population have access), but accessibility for larger GS is low. When a walking speed of 2 km/h is assumed, then accessibility drops to 29 %, 5 %, 5 % and 5 % respectively. We found that calculation results for the four types of UGS are statistically different, and therefore one type cannot replace another in case of monitoring: Higher UGS provision does not guarantee higher accessibility.
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2023-11-27
dc.format.extent12 páginas
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127791
dc.identifier.eissn1610-8167
dc.identifier.issn1618-8667
dc.identifier.issn1618-8667
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:85142330969
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127791
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/75427
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000890331700001
dc.information.autorucInstituto de Geografía; Truffello, Ricardo; 0000-0002-6601-9770; 12336
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesoContenido completo
dc.publisherELSEVIER GMBH
dc.revistaURBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectGreen spaces provision
dc.subjectGreen spaces accessibility
dc.subjectSustainable development goals
dc.subjectResidential green spaces
dc.subjectUrban parks
dc.subjectUrban natural remnants
dc.subject.ods11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
dc.subject.odspa11 Ciudades y comunidades sostenibles
dc.titleComparing green spaces provision and accessibility indicators over a latitudinal gradient and multiple climate zones
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen79
sipa.codpersvinculados12336
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S161886672200334X-main.pdf
Size:
7.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas
CEDEUS