Argumentations and Logic

Simple item page
dc.catalogadorpva
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T20:25:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T20:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis paper comments on John Corcoran’s “Argumentations and Logic,” in which his author proposes that logic is the study of argumentations. Since this view challenges the traditional hylomorphic interpretation of logic as the study of formal arguments, which he identifies to Quine’s definition as the systematic studies of tautologies, and it makes difficult to distinguish logic from the contemporary theory of argumentation, I have opened a third alternative proposing to distinguish argument from argumentation through a renewal of the ancient quinquepartite doctrine saying that any logical argument contains the minimal parts for being conclusive, while any argumentation also contains the proof that make either credible or valid the premises of an argument.
dc.fuente.origenSCOPUS
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-44461-6_5
dc.identifier.eisbn978-3-031-44461-6
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-031-44460-9
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:85198342523
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44461-6_5
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/88157
dc.information.autorucInstituto de Filosofía; Correia, Manuel; S/I; 73343
dc.language.isoen
dc.lugar.publicacionCham
dc.nota.accesocontenido parcial
dc.pagina.final81
dc.pagina.inicio71
dc.publisherBirkhäuser
dc.relation.ispartofUniversal Logic, Ethics, and Truth
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectJohn Corcoran
dc.subjectQuinquepartite doctrine
dc.subjectArgumentation
dc.subjectLogical hylomorphism
dc.subjectTautologies
dc.subject.ddc100
dc.subject.deweyFilosofíaes_ES
dc.titleArgumentations and Logic
dc.typecapítulo de libro
dc.volumenPart F2845
sipa.codpersvinculados73343
sipa.trazabilidadSCOPUS;2024-07-21
Files
Collections
Capítulos de libros