Reportes, informes y documentos de trabajo

Permanent URI for this collection

https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/84299

Browse

Browsing Reportes, informes y documentos de trabajo by Subject "01 No poverty"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Estratificación, desigualdad y pacto social en el Chile actual: evaluaciones y preferencias de la población para la política pública
    (CEPAL, 2023) Méndez Layera, María Luisa; Barozet, Emmanuelle; Espinoza Espinoza, Vicente Iván; Contreras, Dante; Gayo, Modesto; Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Universidad de Chile; UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO; Universidad de Chile; Universidad Diego Portales
    En este informe se analiza la forma en que la estructura social imperante en Chile se vincula con las brechas sociales y los consensos con respecto a la justicia social. Se ofrece un panorama general sobre la estratificación y la desigualdad y el impacto de ambas en la política pública. De esta forma, el estudio contribuye a profundizar el debate sobre estratificación social en Chile, caracterizando a los estratos sociales en relación con su orientación política, y revelando las diferencias y zonas grises que se observan en la población chilena respecto a sus percepciones individuales y sus preferencias políticas, con el foco puesto en la coyuntura de los últimos años. Esta coyuntura ha tenido un efecto en el alineamiento político de la población chilena y en sus preferencias respecto del tipo de pacto social que necesita el país. Todo esto en un contexto económico difícil y menos posibilidades de movilidad social a través de la educación.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy processes of regulatory, voluntary and partnership policies to improve food environments: an evidence synthesis
    (2024) Blanchard, Laurence; Ray, Stephanie; Law, Cherry; Vega Salas, María Jesús; Bidonde, Julia; Bridge, Gemma; Egan, Matt; Petticrew, Mark; Rutter,Harry; Knai, Cécile
    Background: Dietary factors are among the largest and costliest drivers of chronic diseases in England. As a response, the government implements a range of population interventions to promote healthy diets by targeting food environments.Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy process of real-world evaluations of national and state policies on improving food environments, with a focus on whether they were regulatory, voluntary or partnership approaches.Data sources: Fourteen relevant English-language databases were searched in November 2020 for studies published between 2010 and 2020.Methods: Six separate evidence reviews were conducted to assess the evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy processes of policies to improve food environments.Results: A total of 483 primary research evaluations and 14 evidence syntheses were included. The study reveals considerable geographic, methodological and other imbalances across the literature, with, for example, 81% of publications focusing only on 12 countries. The systematic reviews also reveal the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reviewed regulatory approaches designed to improve health, consumer behaviour and food environment outcomes while public–private partnerships and voluntary approaches to improve diets via reformulation, advertising and promotion restrictions or other changes to the environment were limited in their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The study also revealed key enabling and impeding factors across regulatory, voluntary and public–private partnership approaches.Conclusion: From the available evidence reviewed, this study finds that regulatory approaches appear most effective at improving the food environment, and voluntary agreements and partnerships have limited effectiveness. These findings should be carefully considered in future public health policy development, as should the findings of geographic imbalance in the evidence and inadequate representation of equity dimensions across the policy evaluations. We find that food policies are at times driven by factors other than the evidence and shaped by compromise and pragmatism. Food policy should be first and foremost designed and driven by the evidence of greatest effectiveness to improve food environments for healthier diets