Colecciones Institucionales
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Colecciones Institucionales by browse.metadata.categoria "Ética"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 77
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemAdam Smith : los conceptos de naturaleza humana en La teoría de los sentimientos morales.(1984) Mertz Zawadzki, Oscar Alberto
- ItemAdam Smith como filósofo político y moral: un debate abierto(2010) Carrasco, Alejandra
- ItemAdam Smith's Impartial Spectator(2016) Carrasco, Alejandra; Fricke, C.
- ItemAlgunas consideraciones generales sobre "ética".(1984) Romo Pérez, Waldo
- ItemAnálisis conceptual de la corrupción y de la probidad pública.(1996) Pacheco Gómez, Máximo; Seminario El Estado y la Prevención de la Corrupción (1994 : Santiago, Chile)
- Item¿Aplicar la ética, aplacar la ética, o aplicarse en ética? Una visión crítica de la ética ambiental en cuanto ética aplicada(2016) Serani Merlo, Alejandro
- ItemAporte de la UC al debate nacional sobre despenalización del aborto(Centro de Políticas Públicas UC, 2014) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
- ItemApplying ethics, placating ethics, or applying ourselves to ethics? A critical view of environmental ethics as applied ethics(2016) Merlo, A. S.There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless. There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless.There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless. There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless.There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless. There is actually a pervasive tendency to consider environmental ethics and bioethics as specific cases pertaining to a supposed kind of ″applied ethics″. Application can be understood in two different meanings: a concrete sense, as in technical applications, and a psychological meaning, as when we mentally apply ourselves to a task. Ethics has been always thought as a practical knowledge, in a ″praxical″ sense and not in a ″poietic″ one. Ethics has to do with ″ends″ not with ″means″; in this sense ethics is ″useless″. Since ethics has to do with the ultimate meaning of things, ethical choices give meaning to all practical activities. In that sense ethics instead of being useless must be considered as ″over-useful″ (Maritain). Nowadays politics tend to instrumentalize ethics in order to political objectives. The consequence has been the reconceptualization of specific ethics as applied ethics. Environmental ethics and bioethics are then submitted to politics following the logic of technical applications. Environmental ethics and bioethics considered as applied ethics are at risk to becoming not only useless, but also meaningless.
- ItemAproximación ética al fenómeno de la corrupción.(1996) Mifsud, Tony; Seminario El Estado y la Prevención de la Corrupción (1994 : Santiago, Chile)
- ItemUna apuesta lógica: contenidos de calidad(2006) Weezel, Aldo Van
- ItemAutonomía y beneficencia en la ética clínica: ni paternalismo ni medicina defensiva(2006) León Correa, Francisco Javier
- ItemBases conceptuales para el estudio de la responsabilidad social de la empresa.(2005) Morandé, Pedro
- ItemBasic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values : A Cross National Study in 15 Countries(2014) Schwartz, S.; Caprara, G.; Vecchione, M.; Bain, P.; Bianchi, G.; Caprara, M.; Cieciuch, J.; Kirmanoglu, H.; Manzi Astudillo, Jorge
- ItemLa bioética: de la ética clínica a una bioética social(2004) León Correa, Francisco Javier
- ItemLa Comisión Nacional de Bioética de Chile: una tarea pendiente. Aporte de la experiencia de las comisiones nacionales de bioética de México e Italia.(2015) Ramos Vergara, Paulina; Arenas Gómez, Alejandra Paz; Santos Alcántara, Manuel
- ItemComportamiento ético en la empresa chilena : análisis de los resultados del barómetro de valores y ética empresarial aplicado el año 2009(2010) Navarrete Alvarez, Carolina Macarena; Majluf S., Nicolás; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de IngenieríaDurante los últimos años, hemos visto una serie de escándalos corporativos, tanto en el sector privado como en el público, en Chile y en todo el mundo, que muestran cuan necesario es integrar la ética en la conducta de las organizaciones a través de la promoción no sólo del logro de resultados sino también de la manera en la que estos resultados son obtenidos. Las compañías actualmente destinan tiempo y recursos en el diseño e implementación de Programas de Ética y Cumplimiento para disminuir los riesgos asociados a las conductas de sus trabajadores.