Browsing by Author "Potin, Marcela"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemModification of pertussis vaccination schedule in Chile, immunization of special groups and control strategies. Commentary from the Consultive Committee of Immunizations of The Chilean Society of Infectious Diseases(SOC CHILENA INFECTOLOGIA, 2012) Potin, Marcela; Cerda, Jaime; Contreras, Lily; Munoz, Alma; Ripoll, Erna; Vergara, RodrigoIn Chile, an increased number of notifications of cases of whooping cough was detected at the beginning of October 2010, and maintained through 2012. Accumulated cases during 2011 were 2,581 (15.0 per 100,000), which is greater than the number of cases registered during the period 2008-2010 (2,460 cases). On the other hand, the local sanitary authority introduced a modification of pertussis vaccination schedule (starting 2012), which consists in the replacement of the second booster of pertussis vaccine (DTwP, administered to 4-year-old children) as well as diphtheria-tetanus toxoid (dT, administered to second grade scholars) for an acellular pertussis vaccine with reduced antigenic content (dTpa), which will be administrated to first grade scholars. The Consultive Committee of Immunizations considers that the modification is adequate, since it extends the age of protection, reducing at least in theory the infection in older scholars and adolescents who are significant sources of transmission of Bordetella pertussis to infants using an adequate vaccine formulation (acellular pertussis vaccine). The available evidence regarding vaccination in special groups (adolescents and adults, health-care workers and pregnant women) and cocooning strategy are commented.
- ItemPresence of Bordetella holmesii in an outbreak of pertussis in Chile(SOC CHILENA INFECTOLOGIA, 2013) Miranda, Carolina; Wozniak, Aniela; Castillo, Claudia; Geoffroy, Enrique; Zumaran, Cecilia; Porte, Lorena; Roman, Juan C.; Potin, Marcela; Garcia, PatriciaThe incidence of whooping cough in Chile ranges from 4.1 and 7.5 per hundred thousand inhabitants. B. pertussis detection is performed by Real Time PCR (Q-PCR) directed to the insertion sequence IS481. However, this sequence is also found in the genome of B. bronchiseptica and B. holmesii. The latter is also a respiratory pathogen whose clinical features are similar to B. pertussis. However, it is important to differentiate between these species because in immunosuppressed patients B. holmesii is more likely to cause bacteremia and is less susceptible to erythromycin. The goal of this work is to measure prospectively and retrospectively the presence of B. holmesii in samples reported positive for B. pertussis in the period 2010-2011. During this period, 1994 nasopharyngeal specimens entered the laboratory for Bordetella sp. PCR, of which 224 were positive. The analysis by Q-PCR directed to the recA gene of B. holmesii of all 224 positive samples determined a prevalence of B. holmesii of 0.6% (12/1994). Because of its more aggressive behavior in immunosupressed patients and its different resistance pattern, routine screening of B. pertussis and B. holmesii is currently performed for all samples in which Bordetella sp PCR is initially detected.
- ItemSafety and Non-Inferiority Evaluation of Two Immunization Schedules with an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults: A Randomized Clinical TrialAbarca Villaseca, Katia; Iturriaga Ortiz, Carolina Alejandra; Urzua, Marcela; Le Corre Perez, Monique Nicole; Pineda Núñez, Augusto Naim; Fernandez Anwandter, Carolina; Domínguez De Landa, María Angelica; González Carbonell, Pablo Andrés; Bueno, Susan M.; Donato, Paulina; Espinoza, Pilar; Fuentes, Daniela; Gonzalez, Marcela; Guzman, Paula; Munoz-Venturelli, Paula; Perez, Carlos M.; Potin, Marcela; Rojas, Alvaro; Gonzalez-Aramundiz, Jose, V; Galvez, Nicolas M. S.; Aguirre-Boza, Francisca; Aljaro, Sofia; Federico Batiz, Luis; Campisto, Yessica; Cepeda, Mariela; Cortes, Aaron; Lopez, Sofia; Loreto Perez, Maria; Schilling, Andrea; Kalergis, Alexis M.Several vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. CoronaVac (R), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has demonstrated safety and immunogenicity, preventing severe COVID-19 cases. We investigate the safety and non-inferiority of two immunization schedules of CoronaVac (R) in a non-inferiority trial in healthy adults. A total of 2302 healthy adults were enrolled at 8 centers in Chile and randomly assigned to two vaccination schedules, receiving two doses with either 14 or 28 days between each. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were solicited adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of each dose, and comparing the number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection 14 days after the second dose between the schedules, respectively. The most frequent local AE was pain at the injection site, which was less frequent in participants aged >= 60 years. Other local AEs were reported in less than 5% of participants. The most frequent systemic AEs were headache, fatigue, and myalgia. Most AEs were mild and transient. There were no significant differences for local and systemic AEs between schedules. A total of 58 COVID-19 cases were confirmed, and all but 2 of them were mild. No differences were observed in the proportion of COVID-19 cases between schedules. CoronaVac (R) is safe, especially in >= 60-year-old participants. Both schedules protected against COVID-19 hospitalization.