Browsing by Author "Pavez, Nicolás"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Can Be Measured in the Exhaled Breath Condensate in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: a Pilot Study
    (2023) Escalona Solari, José Antonio; Soto Muñoz, Dagoberto Igor; Oviedo Álvarez, Vanessa Andrea; Rivas Garrido, Elizabeth Alexis; Severino, Nicolás; Kattan Tala, Eduardo José; Andresen Hernández, Max Alfonso; Bravo Morales, Sebastián Ignacio; Basoalto Escobar, Roque Ignacio; Bachmann Barron, María Consuelo; Kwok-Yin, Wong; Pavez, Nicolás; Bruhn Cruz, Alejandro Rodrigo; Bugedo Tarraza, Guillermo Jaime; Retamal Montes, Jaime Alejandro
    Different techniques have been proposed to measure antibiotic levels within the lung parenchyma; however, their use is limited because they are invasive and associated with adverse effects. We explore whether beta-lactam antibiotics could be measured in exhaled breath condensate collected from heat and moisture exchange filters (HMEFs) and correlated with the concentration of antibiotics measured from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). We designed an observational study in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, which required a BAL to confirm or discard the diagnosis of pneumonia. We measured and correlated the concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and exhaled breath condensate collected from HMEFs. We studied 12 patients, and we detected the presence of antibiotics in plasma, ELF, and HMEFs from every patient studied. The concentrations of antibiotics were very heterogeneous over the population studied. The mean antibiotic concentration was 293.5 (715) ng/mL in plasma, 12.3 (31) ng/mL in ELF, and 0.5 (0.9) ng/mL in HMEF. We found no significant correlation between the concentration of antibiotics in plasma and ELF (R2 = 0.02, p = 0.64), between plasma and HMEF (R2 = 0.02, p = 0.63), or between ELF and HMEF (R2 = 0.02, p = 0.66). We conclude that beta-lactam antibiotics can be detected and measured from the exhaled breath condensate accumulated in the HMEF from mechanically ventilated patients. However, no correlations were observed between the antibiotic concentrations in HMEF with either plasma or ELF.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Continuous prolonged prone positioning in COVID-19-related ARDS: a multicenter cohort study from Chile
    (2022) Cornejo, Rodrigo A.; Montoya, Jorge; Gajardo, Abraham I. J.; Graf, Jerónimo; Alegría Vargas, Leyla; Baghetti, Romyna; Irarrázaval, Anita; Santis, César; Pavez, Nicolás; Leighton, Sofía; Tomicic, Vinko; Morales, Daniel; Ruiz Balart, Carolina; Navarrete, Pablo; Vargas, Patricio; Gálvez, Roberto; Espinosa, Victoria; Lazo, Marioli; Pérez-Araos, Rodrigo A.; Garay, Osvaldo; Sepúlveda, Patrick; Martinez, Edgardo; Bruhn, Alejandro; The SOCHIMI Prone-COVID-19 Group; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de Medicina
    Background Prone positioning is currently applied in time-limited daily sessions up to 24 h which determines that most patients require several sessions. Although longer prone sessions have been reported, there is scarce evidence about the feasibility and safety of such approach. We analyzed feasibility and safety of a continuous prolonged prone positioning strategy implemented nationwide, in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Chile. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), conducted in 15 Intensive Care Units, which adhered to a national protocol of continuous prone sessions  ≥ 48 h and until PaO2:FiO2 increased above 200 mm Hg. The number and extension of prone sessions were registered, along with relevant physiologic data and adverse events related to prone positioning. The cohort was stratified according to the first prone session duration: Group A, 2–3 days; Group B, 4–5 days; and Group C, > 5 days. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess whether the duration of prone sessions could impact safety. Results: We included 417 patients who required a first prone session of 4 (3–5) days of whom 318 (76.3%) received only one session. During the first prone session the main adverse event was grade 1–2 pressure sores in 97 (23.9%) patients; severe adverse events were infrequent with 17 non-scheduled extubations (4.2%). 90-day mortality was 36.2%. Ninety-eight patients (24%) were classified as group C; they exhibited a more severe ARDS at baseline, as reflected by lower PaO2:FiO2 ratio and higher ventilatory ratio, and had a higher rate of pressure sores (44%) and higher 90-day mortality (48%). However, after adjustment for severity and several relevant confounders, prone session duration was not associated with mortality or pressure sores. Conclusions: Nationwide implementation of a continuous prolonged prone positioning strategy for COVID-19 ARDS patients was feasible. Minor pressure sores were frequent but within the ranges previously described, while severe adverse events were infrequent. The duration of prone session did not have an adverse effect on safety.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Simulation-based mastery learning of bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy competency acquisition and skills transfer to a cadaveric model
    (2021) Kattan Tala, Eduardo José; De la Fuente Sanhueza, René; Putz de la Fuente, Francisca Carolina; Vera Alarcón, María Magdalena; Corvetto Aqueveque, Marcia Antonia; Inzunza, Oscar; Achurra Tirado, Pablo; Inzunza Agüero, Martín Alejandro; Muñoz Gama, Jorge; Sepúlveda Fernández, Marcos Ernesto; Gálvez Yanjarí, Víctor Andrés; Pavez, Nicolás; Retamal Montes, Jaime; Bravo Morales, Sebastián
    Introduction: Although simulation-based training has demonstrated improvement of procedural skills and clinical outcomes in different procedures, there are no published training protocols for bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (BG-PDT). The objective of this study was to assess the acquisition of BG-PDT procedural competency with a simulation-based mastery learning training program, and skills transfer into cadaveric models. Methods: Using a prospective interventional design, 8 trainees naive to the procedure were trained in a simulation-based mastery learning BG-PDT program. Students were assessed using a multimodal approach, including blind global rating scale (GRS) scores of video-recorded executions, total procedural time, and hand-motion tracking–derived parameters. The BG-PDT mastery was defined as proficient tracheostomy (successful procedural performance, with less than 3 puncture attempts, and no complications) with GRS scores higher than 21 points (of 25). After mastery was achieved in the simulator, residents performed 1 BG-PDT execution in a cadaveric model. Results: Compared with baseline, in the final training session, residents presented a higher procedural proficiency (0% vs. 100%, P < 0.001), with higher GRS scores [8 (6–8) vs. 25 (24–25), P = 0.01] performed in less time [563 (408–600) vs. 246 (214–267), P = 0.01] and with higher movement economy. Procedural skills were further transferred to the cadaveric model. Conclusions: Residents successfully acquired BG-PDT procedural skills with a simulation-based mastery learning training program, and skills were effectively transferred to a cadaveric model. This easily replicable program is the first simulation-based BG-PDT training experience reported in the literature, enhancing safe competency acquisition, to further improve patient care.