Browsing by Author "Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis
    (2024) Salinas, María Paz; Sepúlveda, Javiera; Hidalgo, Leonel; Peirano, Dominga; Morel, Macarena; Uribe, Pablo; Rotemberg, Verónica; Briones, Juan; Mery, Domingo; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian
    Scientific research of artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology has increased exponentially. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of AI algorithms for skin cancer classification in comparison to clinicians with different levels of expertise. Based on PRISMA guidelines, 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were screened for relevant articles up to August 2022. The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity was performed for the accuracy of AI and clinicians. Fifty-three studies were included in the systematic review, and 19 met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Considering all studies and all subgroups of clinicians, we found a sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) of 87.0% and 77.1% for AI algorithms, respectively, and a Sn of 79.78% and Sp of 73.6% for all clinicians (overall); differences were statistically significant for both Sn and Sp. The difference between AI performance (Sn 92.5%, Sp 66.5%) vs. generalists (Sn 64.6%, Sp 72.8%), was greater, when compared with expert clinicians. Performance between AI algorithms (Sn 86.3%, Sp 78.4%) vs expert dermatologists (Sn 84.2%, Sp 74.4%) was clinically comparable. Limitations of AI algorithms in clinical practice should be considered, and future studies should focus on real-world settings, and towards AI-assistance.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Accuracy in anatomical location on dermatological surgery: a multi‐centre retrospective study
    (2023) Donoso, Francisca; Hidalgo, Leonel; Cowen, Emily A.; Villagran, Sofía; Villablanca, Paula; Puerto, Constanza del; Silva‐Valenzuela, Sergio; Galimany, Lucas; Majerson, Daniela; Andino, Romina; Uribe, Pablo; Droppelmann, Katherine; Cárdenas, Consuelo; Abarzúa‐Araya, Álvaro; Castro‐Ayala, Juan C.; Kurtansky, Nicholas R.; Halpern, Allan C.; Molenda, Matthew A.; Rotemberg, Veronica; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Biopsy type does not affect the number of stages during Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective study
    (Oxford University Press, 2023) Araneda Ortega, Paulina Belén; Donoso Mena, Francisca; Castro, Juan C.; Uribe González, Pablo Francisco; Rossi, Anthony M.; Hibler, Brian P.; Droppelmann Droppelmann, Katherine Ann; Cárdenas De La Torre, Consuelo Paz; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian
    Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the treatment of choice for high-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding which biopsy type is more appropriate to obtain tumour samples prior to MMS. Shave or punch biopsies are performed depending on the clinical characteristics of the tumour, surgeon experience and local protocols. However, biopsy type might result in difficult histopathological interpretation and influence the practical implementation of MMS. We performed a retrospective study on 208 consecutive BCCs treated with MMS. Of the 208 BCC biopsies, 42 (20.2%) were obtained by the shave method and 166 (79.8%) via punch. Those obtained with the shave technique had a mean of 1.64 stages vs. 1.69 stages with the punch technique (P = 0.130). These findings suggest biopsy type does not affect Mohs surgery performance. The biopsy type of choice is the one deemed adequate for each specific case to obtain a diagnosis and tumour subtyping., In this study including 208 primary basal cell carcinomas undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), there were no differences in the mean number of stages, regardless of which biopsy type was performed (shave vs. punch). The biopsy technique might affect correct subtype identification; however, there were also no differences in the rate of upstaging. Any tissue reaction could also result in difficult histopathological interpretation on frozen sections; however, this was not evident in our study. It seems that biopsy type, shave vs. punch, does not affect MMS performance; thus the more appropriate biopsy type is the one deemed adequate for each specific case in order to obtain a diagnosis as well as tumour subtyping.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multiple aggregated yellow‐white globules, a dermoscopic sign to be considered in the presurgical evaluation in Mohs surgery
    (2022) Hidalgo, Leonel; Donoso, Francisca; Guzmán, Mariana; Millán, Rocío; Curi, Maximiliano; Misad‐Saide, Carlos; Cárdenas, Consuelo; Droppelmann, Katherine; Abarzúa, Álvaro; Uribe, Pablo; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian