Browsing by Author "Born, Pablo"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Coexistence of a fuid responsive state and venous congestion signals in critically ill patients: a multicenter observational proof-of-concept study
    (2024) Muñoz, Felipe; Born, Pablo; Bruna, Mario; Ulloa, Rodrigo; Gonzalez Almonacid, Cecilia Ignacia; Philp Sandoval, Valerie Rose; Mondaca Pavie, Roberto Francisco     ; Blanco Guerrero, Juan Pablo; Valenzuela Espinoza, Emilio Daniel; Retamal Montes, Jaime; Miralles, Francisco; Wendel-Garcia, Pedro D.; Ospina-Tascón, Gustavo A.; Castro Lopez, Ricardo Adolfo; Rola, Philippe; Bakker, Jan; Hernández P., Glenn; Kattan Tala, Eduardo José
    Background: Current recommendations support guiding fluid resuscitation through the assessment of fluid responsiveness. Recently, the concept of fluid tolerance and the prevention of venous congestion (VC) have emerged as relevant aspects to be considered to avoid potentially deleterious side effects of fluid resuscitation. However, there is paucity of data on the relationship of fluid responsiveness and VC. This study aims to compare the prevalence of venous congestion in fluid responsive and fluid unresponsive critically ill patients after intensive care (ICU) admission. Methods: Multicenter, prospective cross-sectional observational study conducted in three medical–surgical ICUs in Chile. Consecutive mechanically ventilated patients that required vasopressors and admitted < 24 h to ICU were included between November 2022 and June 2023. Patients were assessed simultaneously for fluid responsiveness and VC at a single timepoint. Fluid responsiveness status, VC signals such as central venous pressure, estimation of left ventricular filling pressures, lung, and abdominal ultrasound congestion indexes and relevant clinical data were collected. Results: Ninety patients were included. Median age was 63 [45–71] years old, and median SOFA score was 9 [7–11]. Thirty-eight percent of the patients were fluid responsive (FR+), while 62% were fluid unresponsive (FR−). The most prevalent diagnosis was sepsis (41%) followed by respiratory failure (22%). The prevalence of at least one VC signal was not significantly different between FR+ and FR− groups (53% vs. 57%, p = 0.69), as well as the proportion of patients with 2 or 3 VC signals (15% vs. 21%, p = 0.4). We found no association between fluid balance, CRT status, or diagnostic group and the presence of VC signals. Conclusions: Venous congestion signals were prevalent in both fluid responsive and unresponsive critically ill patients. The presence of venous congestion was not associated with fluid balance or diagnostic group. Further studies should assess the clinical relevance of these results and their potential impact on resuscitation and monitoring practices.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Corticosteroids use and risk of respiratory coinfections in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19
    (2021) Ceballos, María Elena; Núñez Palma, Carolina Verónica; Uribe, Javier; Vera Alarcón, María Magdalena; Castro López, Ricardo; García C., Patricia; Arriata, Gabriel; Gándara, Vicente; Vargas, Camila; Domínguez De Landa, María Angélica; Cerón, Inés; Born, Pablo; Espíndola, Eduardo
    Background: To describe respiratory coinfections, predictive factors and outcomes in patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) with COVID-19. Methods: Cohort study, carried out in a Chilean single tertiary Hospital. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU that required MV were included between 1 June and 31 July 2020 Results: 175 patients were admitted to ICU and required MV. Of these, 71 patients developed at least one respiratory coinfection (40.6 %). Early coinfections and late coinfections were diagnosed in 1.7% and 31.4% of all patients admitted to ICU respectively. Within late coinfections, 88% were bacterial, 10% were fungal, and 2% were viral coinfections. One third of isolated bacteria were multidrug-resistant. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk for coinfection was 7.7 times higher for patients with history of corticosteroids (adOR = 7.65, CI 95%: 1.04-56.2, p=0,046) and 2.7 times higher for patients that received dexamethasone during hospitalization (adOR=2.69; CI 95%: 1.14-6.35, p=0,024) than patients that were not exposed. For each additional day in MV, the risk of coinfection increases 1.1 times (adOR=1.06; CI 95%: 1.01-1.11, p=0,025)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Expanding ICU facilities in a pandemic scenario
    (SOC MEDICA SANTIAGO, 2020) Andresen, Max; Born, Pablo; Kattan, Eduardo; Vera, Magdalena; Cataldo, Alejandro; Ruiz, Carolina; Bravo, Sebastian
    Our country is suffering the effects of the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Because the vulnerability of healthcare systems, especially the intensive care areas they can rapidly be overloaded. That challenge the ICUs simultaneously on multiple fronts making urgent to increase the number of beds, without lowering the standards of care. The purpose of this article is to discuss some aspects of the national situation and to provide recommendations on the organizational management of intensive care units such as isolation protocols, surge in ICU bed capacity, ensure adequate supplies, protect and train healthcare workers maintaining quality clinical management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Intubation timing as determinant of outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by SARS-CoV-2 infection
    (2021) Vera Alarcón, María Magdalena; Kattan Tala, Eduardo José; Born, Pablo; Rivas, E.; Amthauer, M.; Nesvadba, A.; Lara, Bárbara; Rao, I.; Espíndola, Eduardo; Rojas Orellana, Luis; Hernández Poblete, Glenn; Bugedo Tarraza, Guillermo; Castro López, Ricardo
    Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection presents in many cases with pneumonia and respiratory failure. It is not clear whether the time of intubation and connection to mechanical ventilation (MV) in this condition is associated with an increase in mortality or represents the natural course of the disease. We conducted an observational, prospective, single-center study to describe the characteristics and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with confirmed COVID-19 and treated with invasive MV to determine whether the time-to-intubation following hospital admission is associated with worse outcomes. Methods: We prospectively included consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and moderate to severe ARDS, admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and connected to MV between March 17 and July 31, 2020. We examined their general characteristics, ventilatory management, and clinical outcomes. Time of intubation was defined as the time from hospital admission to endotracheal intubation and was categorized as early (<72 hours) or late (≥72 hours). Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact, were used when appropriate. Uni and multivariate analyses between main outcome and explanatory variables were performed. Results: A total of 183 consecutive patients were included, 28% (51/183) were female, and their median age was 62 years [54-70]. One hundred (55%) patients were subjected to early and 83 (45%) to late intubation. Patients intubated after 72 hours were older and presented more comorbidities. Mortality was higher in the group of patients with late intubation (41% versus 21%; p= 0.002), a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <100 mmHg at admission (p= 0.029), and that were older than 60 years (p= 0.008). Conclusions: In acute COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe ARDS, intubation after 72 hours following hospital admission, age >60 years-old and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <100 at admission may appear to be associated with increased ICU mortality. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and establish the best timing for intubation in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Secondary respiratory early and late infections in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19
    (2022) Ceballos, María Elena; Nuñez, Ingrid; Uribe, Javier; Vera Alarcón, María Magdalena; Castro López, Ricardo; García C., Patricia; Arriata, Gabriel; Gándara, Vicente; Vargas Muñoz, Camila; Domínguez De Landa, María Angélica; Cerón, Inés; Born, Pablo; Espíndola, Eduardo
    Background: Patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation may become aggravated with a secondary respiratory infection. The aim of this study was to describe secondary respiratory infections, their predictive factors, and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. Methods: A cohort study was carried out in a single tertiary hospital in Santiago, Chile, from 1st June to 31st July 2020. All patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit that required mechanical ventilation were included. Results: A total of 175 patients were enrolled, of which 71 (40.6%) developed at least one secondary respiratory infection during follow-up. Early and late secondary infections were diagnosed in 1.7% and 31.4% respectively. Within late secondary infections, 88% were bacterial, 10% were fungal, and 2% were of viral origin. One-third of isolated bacteria were multidrug-resistant. Bivariate analysis showed that the history of corticosteroids used before admission and the use of dexamethasone during hospitalization were associated with a higher risk of secondary infections (p = 0.041 and p = 0.019 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that for each additional day of mechanical ventilation, the risk of secondary infection increases 1.1 times (adOR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02–1.13, p = 0.008) Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit and requiring mechanical ventilation had a high rate of secondary infections during their hospital stay. The number of days on MV was a risk factor for acquiring secondary respiratory infections.