Browsing by Author "Alseidi, Adnan"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking advantage of asynchronous digital feedback: development of an at‑home basic suture skills training program for undergraduate medical students that facilitates skills retention
    (2023) Belmar Riveros, Francisca; Gaete Dañobeitia, María Inés; Durán Espinoza, Valentina; Chelebifski Vargas, Slavka; Jarry Trujillo, Cristián; Ortiz Koh, Catalina; Escalona, Gabriel; Villagrán Gutiérrez, Ignacio Andrés; Alseidi, Adnan; Zamorano Rivera, Elga; Pimentel Muller, Fernando; Crovari Eulufi, Fernando; Varas Cohen, Julián; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Centro de Cirugía Experimental y Simulación. Departamento de Cirugía Digestiva; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Departamento de Cirugía Digestiva
    Purpose to date, there are no training programs for basic suturing that allow remote deliberate practice. This study seeks to evaluate the efectiveness of a basic suture skills training program and its 6-month skill retention applying unsupervised practice and remote digital feedback. Methods Fourth-year medical-student trainees reviewed instructional videos from a digital platform and performed unsu pervised practice as needed at their homes. When they felt competent, trainees uploaded a video of themselves practicing the skill. In<72 h, they received expert asynchronous digital feedback. The course had two theoretical stages and fve video-based assessments, where trainees performed diferent suturing exercises. For the assessment, a global (GRS) and specifc rating scale (SRS) were used, with a passing score of 20 points (max:25) and 15 (max:20), respectively. Results were compared to previously published work with in-person expert feedback (EF) and video-guided learning without feedback (VGL). A subgroup of trainees underwent a 6-month skills retention assessment. Results Two-hundred and forty-three trainees underwent the course between March and December 2021. A median GRS of 24 points was achieved in the fnal assessment, showing signifcantly higher scores (p<0.001) than EF and VGL (20.5 and 15.5, respectively). Thirty-seven trainees underwent a 6-month skills retention assessment, improving in GRS (23.38 vs 24.03, p value=0.06) and SRS (18.59 vs 19, p value=0.07). Conclusion It is feasible to teach basic suture skills to undergraduate medical students using an unsupervised training course with remote and asynchronous feedback through a digital platform. This methodology allows continuous training with the repetition of quality practice, personalized feedback, and skills retention at 6 months.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Video-based guided simulation without peer or expert feedbackis not enough : a randomized controlled trial of simulation based training for medical students
    (2021) Tejos, Rodrigo; Crovari Eulufi, Fernando; Achurra Tirado, Pablo; Ávila, Rubén; Inzunza, Martín; Jarry, Cristián; Martínez C., Jorge; Riquelme Pérez, Arnoldo; Alseidi, Adnan; Varas, Julián
    Background Feedback is a pivotal cornerstone and a challenge in psychomotor training. There are different teaching methodologies; however, some may be less effective. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in 130 medical students to compare the effectiveness of the video-guided learning (VLG), peer-feedback (PFG) and the expert feedback (EFG) for teaching suturing skills. The program lasted 4 weeks. Students were recorded making 3-simple stitches (pre-assessment and post-assessment). The primary outcome was a global scale (OSATS). The secondary outcomes were performance time, specific rating scale (SRS) and the impact of the intervention (IOI), defined as the variation between the final and initial OSATS and SRS scores. Results No significant differences were found between PFG and EFG in post-assessment results of OSATS, SRS scores or in the IOI for OSATS and SRS scores. Post-assessment results of PFG and EFG were significantly superior to VLG in OSATS and SRS scores [(19.8 (18.5–21); 16.6 (15.5–17.5)) and (20.3 (19.88–21); 16.8 (16–17.5)) vs (15.7 (15–16); 13.3 (12.5–14)) (p \0.05)], respectively. The results of PFG and EFG were significantly superior to VLG in the IOI for OSATS [7 (4.5–9) and 7.4 (4.88–10) vs 3.5 (1.5–6) (p \0.05)] and SRS scores [5.4 (3.5–7) and 6.3 (4–8.5) vs 3.1 (1.13–4.88) (p \0.05)], respectively. Conclusion The video-guided learning methodology without any kind of feedback is not enough for teaching suturing skills compared to expert or peer feedback. The peer feedback methodology appears to be a viable alternative to handling the emerging demands in medical education.