(1) Background: Earwax might provide the long-term concentration of substances that are altered in chronic diseases. Standardised earwax extraction has to be exclusively performed by clinicians. We investigated the safety, reliability, and tolerance of a novel self-sampling earwax device in comparison with a clinical method; (2) Methods: We compared the reliability between both methods in a longitudinal study. We first cleaned both ears at baseline in 37 controls. Secondly, we obtained a sample a month after by extracting earwax from the right ear with a novel self-sampling device, and from the left ear by using the clinical method. Reliability of both methods was measured by coefficients of variation; (3) Results: The weight of the baseline samples was not significantly different between ear sides. The reliability of the two methods was not significantly different. The self-extraction method removed eight times more earwax than the clinical method. The new method proved to be well tolerated; (4) Conclusions: The novel device was as reliable as the clinical method in sampling earwax. In view of its practicality, safety, tolerability and efficiency, the new method may have clinical applications at a reduced cost.
Registro Sencillo
Registro Completo
Autor | Herane-Vives, Andres Sandoval, Rodrigo Ortega, Lorena Espinoza, Susana Cleare, Anthony Hayes, Alexander Ortuzar, Esteban Valdenegro, Tomas Aguilo, Bruno Benoehr, Jan Arnone, Danilo |
Título | A Novel Earwax Self-Sampling Device: A Feasibility Study |
Revista | Applied sciences-basel |
ISSN electrónico | 2076-3417 |
Volumen | 11 |
Número de publicación | 11 |
Fecha de publicación | 2021 |
Resumen | (1) Background: Earwax might provide the long-term concentration of substances that are altered in chronic diseases. Standardised earwax extraction has to be exclusively performed by clinicians. We investigated the safety, reliability, and tolerance of a novel self-sampling earwax device in comparison with a clinical method; (2) Methods: We compared the reliability between both methods in a longitudinal study. We first cleaned both ears at baseline in 37 controls. Secondly, we obtained a sample a month after by extracting earwax from the right ear with a novel self-sampling device, and from the left ear by using the clinical method. Reliability of both methods was measured by coefficients of variation; (3) Results: The weight of the baseline samples was not significantly different between ear sides. The reliability of the two methods was not significantly different. The self-extraction method removed eight times more earwax than the clinical method. The new method proved to be well tolerated; (4) Conclusions: The novel device was as reliable as the clinical method in sampling earwax. In view of its practicality, safety, tolerability and efficiency, the new method may have clinical applications at a reduced cost. |
Derechos | acceso restringido |
DOI | 10.3390/app11114882 |
Enlace | |
Id de publicación en WoS | WOS:000659557600001 |
Palabra clave | self-sampling earwax device clinical method cotton swabs |
Tema ODS | 03 Good Health and Well-being |
Tema ODS español | 03 Salud y bienestar |
Tipo de documento | artículo |