Social acceptability is a determinant factor in the failure or success of the government's decisions about which electricity generation sources will satisfy the growing demand for energy. The main goal of this study was to validate a causal trust-acceptability model for electricity generation sources. In the model, social acceptance of an energy source is directly caused by perceived risk and benefit and also by social trust in regulatory agencies (both directly and indirectly, through perceived risk and benefit). Results from a web-based survey of Chilean university students demonstrated that data for energy sources that are controversial in Chilean society (fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear power) fit the hypothesized model, whereas data for non conventional renewable energy sources (solar, wind, geothermal and tidal) did not. Perceived benefit had the greatest total effect on acceptability, thus emerging as a key predictive factor of social acceptability of controversial electricity generation sources. Further implications for regulatory agencies are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Registro Sencillo
Registro Completo
Autor | Bronfman, Nicolas C. Jimenez, Raquel B. Arevalo, Pilar C. Cifuentes, Luis A. |
Título | Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources |
Revista | ENERGY POLICY |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
Volumen | 46 |
Página inicio | 246 |
Página final | 252 |
Fecha de publicación | 2012 |
Resumen | Social acceptability is a determinant factor in the failure or success of the government's decisions about which electricity generation sources will satisfy the growing demand for energy. The main goal of this study was to validate a causal trust-acceptability model for electricity generation sources. In the model, social acceptance of an energy source is directly caused by perceived risk and benefit and also by social trust in regulatory agencies (both directly and indirectly, through perceived risk and benefit). Results from a web-based survey of Chilean university students demonstrated that data for energy sources that are controversial in Chilean society (fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear power) fit the hypothesized model, whereas data for non conventional renewable energy sources (solar, wind, geothermal and tidal) did not. Perceived benefit had the greatest total effect on acceptability, thus emerging as a key predictive factor of social acceptability of controversial electricity generation sources. Further implications for regulatory agencies are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Derechos | acceso restringido |
Agencia financiadora | Chile's Conicyt program through the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (Fondecyt) Universidad Andres Bello |
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.057 |
Editorial | ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
Enlace | |
Id de publicación en WoS | WOS:000305592300024 |
Paginación | 7 páginas |
Palabra clave | Energy sources Public trust and acceptability Risk and benefit perception GENE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE RISK REGULATION TRUST PERCEPTION FOOD ACCEPTABILITY KNOWLEDGE HAZARDS STORAGE |
Tema ODS | 13 Climate Action |
Tema ODS español | 13 Acción por el clima |
Tipo de documento | artículo |